Now we have all the tools and material ready to deduce the equations of motion for the system of particles in an expanding universe.

Even though the parameterized orbits in equation (3.21) are different from the
paths from Hamilton's principle, they behave similarly in the action *A* from equation
(3.1). We can therefore use the same deduction as we did in Section
3.2. The rewritten version of equation (3.5),
satisfying the notation of the current case, is

The next step now is to insert the Lagrangian from equation (3.20), which results in

where the peculiar gravitational acceleration is given by

measured by a comoving observer at rest relative to distant matter. Note that the second term in equation (3.26) cancel the first in the limit of a homogeneous mass distribution.

As discussed in section 3.2, the last term in equation
(3.25) cancel out when the path is fixed at the end-points;
i.e. the variation at *t*=0 and . As mentioned, P-89
showed that also mixed boundary conditions can be applied, which he gave as

The first condition is the same as in Hamilton's principle; i.e. the variation vanishes. It is with the second condition that we get a deviation. It indicates that the peculiar velocities vanish as one gets close to the primeval area, which is in correspondence with the gravitational instability picture. By comparing these boundary values to the last term in equation (3.25), one can easily see that the former cancels the latter. Hence, Hamilton's principle, or in this case, the AVP applies.

The resulting derivative of the action is

Thus, we see that orbits that satisfy the set of equations

satisfy time averages of the usual cosmological equations of motion.

With the assistance of the fundamental theorem of variational calculus (see Section
3.2), we have the equations of motion given by the parameters ,
, and *t*:

When dealing with problems in cosmology, it is often convenient to consider the
expansion parameter as a measure of time instead the usual SI-unit, seconds. It is even
more convenient if one assumes the expansion parameter to be zero at the Big Bang,
=0) = 0, and unity at the present, = . The transformation
from time to scale factor in the matter dominated epoch of the Universe is given by the
Friedmann-equations: In the case considered here, where the Universe is cosmologically
flat (*k*=0), have zero pressure, and a non-negligible cosmological constant ,
it is

The product is constant throughout the history of the
Universe; thus, we have . The Friedmann equations also tell us
that when *k*=0. If we include these two expressions, and , in equation (3.31), we arrive at

After rearranging this equation, we get an expression for the time interval given by an interval in the expansion parameter

A similar expression for a curved universe with can be derived:

The only difference between equation (3.33) and
(3.34) is the exponent of *a* in the denominator. Only the former
equation will be considered here.

Inserting equation (3.33) into equation (3.30) gives us
the equation of motion expressed in the parameters , , and *a*:

where is the present radius of a sphere that would contain the total mass of particles in the solution if the mass density was homogeneous. is given by

where

I close this section by noting that the boundary conditions in equation (3.27) can be arbitrary and are not restricted to the form needed by the AVP, since they were only used to remove the integrated part in equation (3.25). The application of equation (3.28) is therefore more general than that of the action principle itself. It is then possible to to use redshifts instead of current positions when calculating the orbits Gia,P-94.

Mon Jul 5 02:59:28 MET DST 1999